Hypothesis
Christianity has adopted a messianic calendar symbolism
that according to the writer has been used on a much vaster scale than visible
at first sight. In this symbolism, the onset of the new area is expressed by the
number that directly follows its complete cyclic period in the traditional Jewish
calendar. The number eight is the most known example of this typical Christian
messianic symbolism, as it represents the resurrection of Jesus on the first day
of the (new) week. This article does however open an interesting discussion
about the possibility that the same symbolism has been applied to other cyclic periods of the Hebrew calendar
resulting in a series of numbers that already have an important symbolical
meaning in Judaism. The fact that these numbers also correspond
with a simple but famous mathematical progression might be more than just an
interesting coincidence. The information and explanations provided are
comprehensive,
while
leaving the final conclusion to the reader.
An other interesting hypothesis of this
article, explained in the same eschatological context of the resurrection, is the
possible answer to the well known 666 symbolism in the book of Revelations. This
article also explains how the
Greek name of Jesus (Ιησους)
corresponds with its numeric equivalent
of 888, connecting the 666 symbolism with
mankind and the corrupted creation of earth, whereas 888 stands for the promised
messiah in the person of Jesus.
These various symbolisms are interlinked with
a new explanation of the ancient geometrical origin of the Greek (Malta) cross
Between circles and squares, crosses and numbers,
explanations of biblical symbolism and architectural proportions, everything
seems to be involved in a mystical messianic symbolism that makes this article interesting to read.
The original article was written in 1994 in
Dutch language and deliberately not published until 2004, the year in which the author translated it in English language and made it public on this website.
Even though many references to religious
texts are used, this does however not mean that the author accepts these
traditions as a historically reliable. Without entering in the never the less
highly interesting discussion about the historical Jesus, the author prefers to
view biblical texts as important religious testimonies, not necessarily as historical facts.
Religious dogmas are approached in an analytical but respectful way.
Your
feedback is appreciated.