previous -
next
Entering into the world of classical
thought can prove to be a difficult challenge. Different works from
different writers create a completely different mental picture. For
instance; the works from Plato are very recognizable and human in their
tone. Plato is never pushy in his style and describes his Socrates
adventures in very charming and intelligent balanced stories. Completely
different and of marginal literary value are the muddled fragments of
which the four gospels are made up. The most prosaic of all New Testament
books is probably Revelations, even though the book is definitely not
recommended as bedtime reading.
Even more fragmented than the four
official gospels is the gospel of Judas Thomas, discovered in 1945 near
the Egyptian town of Nag Hamadi. This gospel is part of an old Christian
tradition called Gnosticism. It is important to understand that even
during the first centuries of prosecuted Christianity, the religious
opinions were so diverse, that several Church fathers made it their
personal goal to extinguish these wide spread manifestations of "heretic"
(read non-official) misbelieve.
Thanks to the Roman emperor Constantine, the Christian
church that by now exists for almost 2000 years managed to prevail. It is
always the victors that decide what will become history, and as such,
since the council of Nicaea of 325AD, we retroactively speak of the only
"True Christianity" as described in the gospels of the New Testament. From
a historical point of view it is however regrettable that the many other
manifestations of Christian believe have been so carefully censored.
Whenever a forgotten book scroll is excavated in the
Middle East, it immediately becomes clear how much more was going on than
what we learn through the Bible. The Qumran findings picture a highly
organized Jewish sectarian group that had its own religious literature. In
the Bible they are mentioned as "those expecting the end of time". The
Thomas gospel pictures an independent Gnostic Christian believe that is
much more mystical than mainstream Christianity. We can only hope that new
findings and historical research will lead to more insight into this
fascinating era that laid the foundations for 2000 years of Christian
"civilization". Some more of the heretic texts that were so zealously
destroyed by the holy Ignatius and others, would have provided a wealth of
information about the origin of Christian believe. For the time being you
will however have to satisfy yourself with the speculations in this
article.
Christian Symbols

The Chrismon was originally almost more
used than
the Latin cross as a symbol for Jesus Christ.
Early Christianity used various symbols that could
express the essence of their believe in Jesus Christ as the Messiah.
Within the roman catholic church, the Latin cross became the most used
symbol, because it expresses the concept of salvation through the death of
Christ. During the first days of Christianity this cross was rarely used
at all because it was seen as an every day torture instrument used by the
hatred Romans to execute criminals and rebels. Much more common was the
symbol of the fish, called Ichthus in Greek, as some sort of anagram for
Ιησους
Χριστος.
Also known was the so called Chrismon, the famous P & X monogram, which in
reality stands for the Greek letters Chi and Rho, the first two letters of
the name Χριστος.
The Malta Cross
Another very old Christian symbol is the so called Mata
Cross. This cross has the most remarkable qualities of all Christian
symbols, jet no one has ever written about it. The official "cross
literature" wants us to believe that the deeper symbolism of this type of
cross resides in a form of four arrows pointed inwards. This example of
meaningless idiocy has been provided merely for its entertainment value.
The true explanation of this fascinating symbol is entirely
different.
In previous chapters of this article it has already been
explained elaborately how mathematics obtained a religious mystical value
during the Classical era that by now is almost impossible to imagine.
Heaven and Earth, God and Man, were mysteries of the same dimensions as
the circle and the square. Immeasurable and incalculable! In our time the
π button on our calculator has broken this spell, but
during antiquity philosophers could be easily agitated by this kind of
cosmic mysteries. Within this historical framework of lines and circle the
Malta cross will be reconstructed as a symbol that unites the circle (God
& Heaven) and the square (Man & Earth) in the person of
Ιησους
Χριστος.
(Jesus Christ)
Another widely accepted symbolic
explanation of the circle and the square represents their
symbolic value of Motion and Rest.
What has been hidden through the centuries
is the fact that the Malta Cross has originally never been a cross but an
oblique symbol, resembling a letter X, as in the name
Χριστος.
As mentioned above, the Malta Cross is a
symbol that represents the union between Circle and Square. The
geometrical construction is very simple and starts with drawing a square.
Next step is to draw four quarters of a circle inside the square in such a
way that they all touch each other in the centre of the square.

The figure that is drawn in this way is
almost complete. The only thing missing is the four indentations that are
unique for the Malta cross. These indentations are crated by uniting the
eight intersection points of the square and the four internal circles by
means of two horizontal and two vertical lines.

The inner square relates to the external
square
according to the the Classical proportion of the "sacred cut" = 1:√2
The four intersection lines crate a new, smaller internal
square that relates to the main square as 1:√2. In
previous chapters it has already been explained how this proportion was
widely used in Classical architecture. A fact that is described by
Vitruvius books on architecture. In our time it was the Danish
scholar Tons Brunés that thoroughly investigated into the use of this
proportion in numerous Classical buildings.
Squaring the Circle
According to Brunés this design is not merely an aesthetic
diagram that represents the union between the square and the circle. He
claims that it also provides the most practical method to draw the
circumference of the circle in the form of a square because the length of
one of the quarter circles inside the square is almost equal to the length
of the diagonal of one half of the square. This is in fact a
architecturally usable method to approach π
because the inaccuracy is lower than 1% as demonstrated by the calculation
below:

The length of a quarter circle (AB)
is: (√2π)/4
The circumference of the entire circle is: √2π ≈ 4,442 882
The length of the diagonal of half the square (CD)
is: √5/2
Circumference of the new square is 2√5 ≈ 4,472 135
Deviation between both circumferences is 0,66%

The number of geometrical
constructions within this pattern are infinite,
and all relate to each other as 1:√2.
Within this diagram you will find the "doubled square" (ABCD
becomes AEFG
thanks to diagonal AC).
The same √2 proportion is also found in the four small rectangles
HIJD
up