Conclusions:
There are so many presumptions that still need further
investigation that it is very difficult to draw final conclusions.
Nevertheless some of the possible scenarios will be briefly discussed. The
interpretation of the facts and assumptions depends on the religious,
historical or scientific background of the reader. Just like beauty, which
according to Shakespeare is in the eye of the beholder, also facts get a
completely different interpretation when beheld from a religious
perspective. By itself all of these interpretations are valid because
everyone has the right to his own opinion. The fact that this article
focuses on a historical perspective should not withhold religious readers
from interpreting the information in completely different way.
scenario I
"Divine
inspiration"
It does not sound very scientific, but basically we are
dealing with a religious subject, so why not accept the fact that God
inspired the writers of the gospels to incorporate the symbolism of the
resurrection numbers. Or even better, why not accept the fact that the
crucifixion and resurrection took place exactly like described in the
gospels and that the symbolism of the resurrection numbers is part of
God's master plan for the new Christian era. After all we are dealing with
religious faith and hardly anyone would still claim the Bible to be a
history book.
scenario II
"Numbers yes but progression no"
Considering the information currently available it is
safe to draw the conclusion that several religious symbolic numbers have
been used in a mystical messianic symbolism of the passion of Jesus. The
666 symbolism of the crucifixion and the 888 symbolism of the resurrection
is convincing but points towards a symbolism that is still strongly
connected to the Torah tradition of God's original creation as described
in Genesis. The use of the forty hours between the death and appearance of
Jesus is proof of this traditional approach. The use of the resurrection
numbers is a logical consequence of the fact that the resurrection was set
to take place at the first day-, the first week-, the first hour-, the
first month-, etc.
The resurrection numbers do have an important
symbolical meaning in the Jewish tradition and this interpretation does
comply with their possible use in the resurrection symbolism of Jesus but
there is no specific evidence that their mathematical progression was also
understood, which for the moment makes it impossible to prove that the
progressive number series by itself was used as the basis for the time-scheme of
the resurrection of Jesus. However, regardless whether the "resurrection umbers" were
understood as a mathematical progression or not, their individual significance in the Jewish
and Hellenistic religious and symbolic tradition provides a valid
explanation for their use.
scenario III
"The mathematic key"
Tangible evidence proves that difficult progressions were
understood and even used by the Pythagoreans and later in Roman
architecture to deduct the irrational number √2. It is
as such impossible that the simplest of all mathematical progressions was
not known. Even if it was not fully understood with all its geometrical
qualities regarding the Golden Section etc, this would still not mean that
the progressive value of the various religious Jewish numbers that
expressed the "quintessence" of the covenant was not understood. Many
mystical Jewish-, Hellenistic- and Christian religious- and philosophical
texts talk about number progression. Number manipulation, especially in
the context of the Hebrew calendar, was such an important task in the
Jewish religious culture that it is unthinkable that in all the hundreds
of years of Jewish and Christian Messianic mysticism nobody managed to see
this over-evident connection.
The fact that no written texts survived in
our time is not surprising considering the verbal Hebrew tradition, the
Diaspora and persecutions of the Jews. Besides this we have to consider the secret
"initiation" character of classical religious- and philosophical societies
plus the fact that all mystical books that might have contained information
were systematically destroyed. Parting from the fact that the progressive
nature of the resurrection numbers must have been clearly understood by
the writer of the passion planning, it becomes clear that even Jesus'
presumed age of 33 was intended
to express the concept of the fulfilled cycle of earthly end-time.
Coincidence
is acceptable up to a certain point, but when all numbers involved in the
resurrection of Jesus are related to a simple mathematical progression, including Jesus
own age, it becomes very difficult to ignore the facts, especially
considering how the narrative gospels originate in the period and
environment of
the biggest splendor of Roman Hellenistic architecture. A period in which it was
highly fashionable to make large scale use of geometrical proportions and
mathematical progressions, similar to the one that much later got a name
through the works of Leonardo Fibonacci.
Origin of the narrative
gospels
What becomes clear is the
fact that the whole story of the death and resurrection of Jesus is an
intricate but tailor-made messianic mystical time scheme. This time scheme
was constructed in such a way that it would gain the maximum symbolic
impact when it comes to expressing the eschatological concept of the Old and the New era
that finished and initiated through Jesus death and resurrection.
The narrative gospels were most likely
written towards the end of the first century, in a period in which the
original Judaic Christian sects of the Diaspora needed a new theological
framework in order to explain the fact that Jesus had not returned on
earth as hoped and expected, especially during and after the "eschatological" wars against the Romans
from 66 to 70 that
lead to the destruction of the Temple in Jerusalem .
Up to that moment no clear Christian
theology explained how Jesus' original resurrection had already paid the
bill for the original sin long before the war against the Romans. Most Judaic Christians were still hoping for a
quick return of their Messiah and prepared for the Last Judgment as the
true eschatological event. Most of them probably hoping that Jesus' return would liberate them from the hated
Romans and restore the Temple in Jerusalem. Because this return did not
come and ever more time passed, the need grew for additional
religious texts that would provide powerful theological proof of the
eschatological importance of the original death and resurrection of their
Messiah. As such it is reasonable to say that until the end of the first
century, the first (mostly Judaic) Christians were simply awaiting the return of their
messiah Jesus.
From the first century onwards, the Judaic
Christian sects of the Diaspora and the "sayings gospel" tradition started to become
increasingly integrated into the Hellenistic cultural background of the
many gentiles that converted to Christianity. This new phase in the
development of Christianity called for new religious texts, that would
highlight the unique Messianic aspects of Jesus' death and resurrection in
a powerful symbolic way that would incorporate both the Judaic
eschatological-, as well as the Hellenistic symbolical traditions. As such
the narrative gospels created the first real Christian dogmas. This was
done in order
to unite the many dispersed sectarian groups of the Diaspora and provide them with a
coherent theological message that would secure survival in the
Roman-Hellenistic world. Since their introduction, the narrative gospels
were gradually modified and later also incorporated the old sayings
gospels as part of the sermon on the mount.
By the time of the institutionalizing of
the Christian faith as the official Church of the Roman empire, many different versions
of Christian gospels circulated. In the mean time, the original inspiration of
Judaic/Hellenistic symbolism had almost completely disappeared into the
background. Already in 135 Hadrian destroyed everything that
was left of original Palestine Judaism. After him, also Roman Christianity turned against the Jewish
people, collectively blaming them of the death of their Christ. What also disappeared into the background
together with the dissociation from Judaism, were the keys to the
resurrection symbolism that was expressed in the passion story of Jesus. As
such, this unique aspect of Judaic/Hellenistic symbolism survived the
editorial censorship of Nicaea in 325AD, and became part of the Christian religion
that by now exists for almost 2000 years.
previous
- next